Buyer's guide
Prefer includes MCP access from its Growth plan, with API access on the same plan. Eleven AI visibility tools with MCP servers compared on plan gate, tool list, write access and API, sourced.
Also inالعربيةPortuguês (Brasil)
The short answer
Prefer does: MCP access starts on Growth ($129 a month) and queries all five engines Prefer tracks, with API access on the same plan. Cituna publishes the fullest documentation (16 named tools, reads from $39, writes on Pro). PromptWatch ($95) and Otterly ($189) include MCP and API on one plan and have write tools per a dated inventory. Qwairy has MCP on Starter ($89), ZipTie sells REST and MCP as a $10 add-on, and SE Ranking bundles MCP with API credits on Core ($129). Peec AI, Profound, Asva AI and LLM Pulse document servers whose plan gate we could not confirm on a pricing page.
Prefer MCP and API from Growth on all five engines it tracks 
Cituna Sixteen named tools with the plan each needs, reads from $39 
PromptWatch MCP and API from $95, create and publish tools named on an inventory DisclosurePrefer publishes this list and ranks itself first. We have not connected to the rival servers ourselves. Every rival fact comes from the vendor's own page or a dated third-party inventory, named next to it, and every rival price from a rendered or dated read of the vendor's pricing page. Where a source is an inventory rather than the vendor, we say so.
In short
How we evaluated
Prefer includes MCP access from Growth ($129 a month), across all five engines it tracks, with API access on the same plan. Ten other tools document MCP: Cituna has the fullest tool list (16 tools, reads from $39), PromptWatch and Otterly have write tools per an inventory, ZipTie sells REST and MCP as a $10 add-on, and Peec AI, Profound and Asva AI publish no plan gate.
MCP on the entry plan, on a higher plan, as an add-on, or on a custom contract are four different prices. We recorded the gate from the vendor's pricing page where we rendered it, and from a dated inventory where we did not.
A server you can plan around has a published tool list. We noted whether the vendor names its tools, whether only a third-party count exists, or whether the page describes the data in prose.
Reads are reporting. Writes let an agent queue scans, draft or publish. We recorded which vendors document writes, on which plan, and from which source.
Some tools ship the REST API on the same plan as MCP, others one tier up or on Enterprise. We noted where it sits, because a reporting pipeline usually needs both.
The scores
Each dimension is scored 0 to 5 on the scale below and the overall is the plain average, so you can check every number against the facts on this page. Prefer is our product and is scored on the same scale.
| Tool | MCP on entry plan | Engines behind the data | Documented tool list | Write access | Price of first plan with MCP | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cituna | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 4.8/5 |
| PromptWatch | 5.0 | 4.0 | 3.0 | 5.0 | 4.0 | 4.2/5 |
| Otterly | 3.0 | 4.0 | 3.0 | 5.0 | 3.0 | 3.6/5 |
| Qwairy | 5.0 | 5.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 3.2/5 |
| Prefer (our product) | 3.0 | 5.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 3.0/5 |
| SE Ranking | 5.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 3.0/5 |
| ZipTie | 4.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 2.8/5 |
How each number is set
Scored 26 September 2026 from the facts on this page: each vendor's pricing page as dated in Sources (Qwairy and SE Ranking rendered 26 September, Otterly and PromptWatch 23 September, ZipTie from its page HTML on 26 September), the vendor MCP pages for Cituna and Asva AI, the four dated inventories, and Prefer's docs and plan facts. Prefer's row uses the same rules as every other row, and it scores 2 on the tool list and on write access because its docs describe the server as a way to query data without naming tools. REST API depth is not scored here because it is a different surface with its own page; the engines dimension asks what the MCP can actually query. Where a tool count or write tool comes from a third-party inventory rather than the vendor (PromptWatch, Otterly, SE Ranking), the score uses it and the item says so. Peec AI, Profound and Asva AI are not scored because no source we read states the plan that includes MCP or its price; LLM Pulse is not scored because its only source is its own ranked list. All four stay in the ranked list on what is documented.
Three kinds of tool
The vendor hosts the server and you connect with a key or OAuth. What differs is the plan gate, whether the tools are named, and whether any of them write.
Buy one if you want the data in Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor without building anything.Built by third parties on top of a vendor's API. Useful when the official server is thin, but unsupported by the vendor and dependent on an API key you may not have on your plan.
Buy the underlying API plan first, then decide whether the community server is worth the maintenance risk.You get endpoints, not an assistant connection. Any MCP would be one you build or a community wrapper.
Buy one if you already have a data team and a reporting stack, and MCP is a nice-to-have.The ranked list
Prefer first (our pick and our product). The rest by the price of the first plan that includes MCP, lowest first; tools whose MCP plan is not documented in a source we read go last.
PreferPrefer is our product. MCP access starts on Growth ($129 a month); Starter has no MCP, no API and no data export. You generate an MCP key in Settings under Integrations, API and MCP, connect it to any MCP client, and query your tracked prompts, mentions, citations, sentiment and share of voice across all five engines Prefer tracks: ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews and Google AI Mode. API access is on the same plans, scheduled warehouse sync is Enterprise only, and Agency Enterprise lists full API and MCP access together. Growth also carries 75 drafted articles a month and the prioritized action engine. The integrations docs describe what the server exposes; they do not publish a tool-by-tool list, and writing stays in the app on purpose: drafting, publishing and queued fixes run through Action Center, where each change is tied to a prompt and re-measured afterwards.
CitunaCituna's MCP page (updated 12 September 2026) documents a hosted server at mcp.cituna.com/mcp and an npm path (npx -y cituna-mcp), with sixteen tools: twelve reads and four writes. Named reads include whoami, get_visibility, get_engine_answers, list_gaps and gsc_query; writes include run_scan, set_gap_status, queue_article and mark_article_published. Reads are on the $39 Starter plan, writes on Pro ($119) and Max ($399), and none of it is in the free trial. The page says plainly that MCP is not unique to Cituna and points to its pairing with Google Search Console as the rarer part. Its FAQ covers REST API availability, but the read we relied on does not record what it says, so the API column is unverified.
ZipTieZipTie prices by prompt slots and engines rather than by plan, with preset starting points from $42.75 a month, unlimited teammates and projects. Its pricing page (read from the page HTML on 26 September 2026, not a rendered check) lists an API and MCP Access add-on at $10 a month: REST at api.ziptie.ai plus an MCP server at api.ziptie.ai/mcp, which exposes every prompt, response, mention, citation, sentiment score and competitor metric. It names Cursor, VS Code and Claude Code as direct connections and Claude Desktop through the local mcp-remote bridge, and publishes rate limits (60 requests a minute per token, 600 a minute per workspace, 50,000 a day; one MCP tool call counts twice). The surface stays off during the 7-day trial. Its docs site is a JavaScript shell in raw HTML, so we could not read a tool list.
LLM PulseEverything we know about LLM Pulse's server comes from its own ranked list, 'Best MCP Servers for AI Visibility in 2026', published 17 August and updated 14 September 2026, which ranks LLM Pulse first. It states about 85 read and write tools and MCP on self-serve plans from 49 euros a month, and its method (unauthenticated tools/list calls on 12 August 2026) is the source for several rival counts on this page. We did not check its pricing page for the MCP gate in this batch, so treat the plan and the count as the vendor's claims. Its agency pages, read for our white-label roundup, also list an API and an MCP server on Partner plans.
QwairyQwairy's pricing page (rendered 26 September 2026) lists MCP server access on Starter, $89 a month for one workspace, 1,300 credits and up to 100 prompts, and the REST API from Growth at $229. Every plan covers ten engines including ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Google AI Overviews, AI Mode, Claude, Grok, Mistral and DeepSeek, with daily, weekly or monthly runs and unlimited team members. CitedIndex's census (updated 12 September 2026) files Qwairy under 'included, no extra gate'. Neither source lists the tools the server exposes.
PromptWatchPromptWatch's pricing page (rendered 23 September 2026) lists MCP and API access on the $95 Essential plan, which also carries 50 prompts on 4 models and 500 agent credits, then Professional at $245 and Business at $579, with a 7-day trial. The endpoint and tool names come from a third-party inventory, Best GEO Software (6 September 2026): server.promptwatch.com/mcp, read tools such as getCitations, getCompetitorHeatmap and listContentGapPrompts, and write tools createContent and publishContentLive. CitedIndex's census agrees on the $95 gate. PromptWatch's own pages, in our reads, name the feature without listing the tools.
SE RankingSE Ranking's subscription page (rendered 26 September 2026) lists '25K API credits and MCP access' on Core, $129 a month, and '100K API credits and MCP access' on Growth at $279; Enterprise adds the full API. AI search tracking (AI Overviews, AI Mode, Perplexity, ChatGPT) is the AI Search add-on at $89 a month for 200 prompts, so the first plan whose MCP returns AI visibility data is Core plus the add-on. A standalone API plan starts at $179 and advertises connecting SE Ranking data to AI assistants over MCP. LLM Pulse's inventory counted 217 tools on the server on 12 August 2026, roughly 40 of them touching AI search, and the awesome-seo-mcp list (hand-checked September 2026) records it as an official server with a published endpoint.
OtterlyOtterly's pricing page (rendered 23 September 2026) lists API and MCP access on Standard, $189 a month for 100 prompts with Agent Analytics, and not on Lite at $29 for 15 prompts. CitedIndex's census (updated 12 September 2026) records the same gate. LLM Pulse's inventory counted 17 tools on the server, 11 reads and 6 writes, from an unauthenticated tools/list call on 12 August 2026. Foglift's guide (September 2026) lists Otterly among the vendors publishing an official MCP surface. Tracking is daily on ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Perplexity and Copilot; Gemini, Claude and AI Mode are paid add-ons.
Peec AIThe awesome-seo-mcp list on GitHub (every entry checked by hand in September 2026) records Peec AI's official remote server at api.peec.ai/mcp with API-key auth, next to a community Peec server with 38 tools. Foglift's guide (vendor docs reviewed in August and on 19 September 2026) lists Peec among the vendors publishing an official MCP surface and puts its REST API on Enterprise only. Peec's agency price list, read for our white-label roundup, mentions reports sent on a schedule through its MCP or agent. Neither inventory states which Peec plan turns the server on, so we have not scored it.
ProfoundLLM Pulse's inventory found 17 tools on Profound's MCP surface, read-only by design, in an unauthenticated tools/list call on 12 August 2026. Foglift's guide lists Profound among the vendors publishing an official MCP surface and records its REST API as Enterprise only. Profound's pricing page (rendered 23 September 2026) offers brands a free 7-day trial and a custom Enterprise plan, so there is no published price for the plan that includes MCP, and neither inventory says whether the trial reaches it. We have not scored it for that reason.
Asva AIAsva AI's MCP page (updated September 2026) documents a server at mcp.asvaai.com/mcp over Streamable HTTP with OAuth 2.1 and PKCE, per-client setup steps, and seven tools by name: list_brands, get_brand_visibility, get_share_of_voice, get_citation_metrics, get_prompt_responses, generate_visibility_audit and generate_llms_txt, across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Copilot, Grok, Meta AI and Google AI Mode. The same page claims that no competing AI visibility platform ships an installable MCP server as of September 2026; the ten other rows on this page show otherwise. The page does not state a price or the plan that includes the server, so we have not scored it.
Side by side
From the vendor pages and inventories dated in Sources. Tools named: full means the vendor lists them, partial means a third-party inventory counts or names them. Write tools: partial means writes are on a higher plan (Cituna) or the vendor's own claim (LLM Pulse). API on entry plan: partial means an add-on (ZipTie) or a second plan (Otterly's Standard). MCP on entry plan: partial means an add-on or an unconfirmed gate. Not offered here means not documented in what we read, not proof of absence. From is the first plan with MCP.
| Tool | MCP server | Tools named | Write tools | API on entry plan | MCP on entry plan | From |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prefer | ✓ | - | - | - | - | $129 |
| Cituna | ✓ | ✓ | ~ | - | ✓ | $39 |
| ZipTie | ✓ | - | - | ~ | ~ | $52.75 |
| LLM Pulse | ✓ | ~ | ~ | - | ~ | EUR 49 |
| Qwairy | ✓ | - | - | - | ✓ | $89 |
| PromptWatch | ✓ | ~ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | $95 |
| SE Ranking | ✓ | ~ | - | ✓ | ✓ | $129 |
| Otterly | ✓ | ~ | ✓ | ~ | - | $189 |
| Peec AI | ✓ | ~ | - | - | - | Ask |
| Profound | ✓ | ~ | - | - | - | Custom |
| Asva AI | ✓ | ✓ | - | - | - | Ask |
What changed in 2026
This list looked different a year ago. These are the changes that moved it.
In this batch, Otterly, PromptWatch, Qwairy, SE Ranking and ZipTie all print MCP on the pricing page itself, next to the plan that includes it. A year ago the phrase lived, if anywhere, in developer docs.
Two vendor lists and a GitHub list now publish tool counts from unauthenticated tools/list calls or hand checks, with dates. A vendor that names its tools gets credited; one that only says 'MCP access' gets a question mark.
Most servers read. A few (PromptWatch, Otterly by count, Cituna on Pro) let an agent queue a scan, draft or publish. Read-only by design, as Profound and Prefer's docs put it, is now a stated choice rather than a gap.
Asva AI's page says no competitor ships an installable server. Ten rows on this page, each dated, say otherwise. Expect more of these claims as MCP becomes the feature buyers ask about.
Red flags
Every tool here demos well. These are the questions that separate them once the trial ends.
It is false on the evidence here and easy to check. Treat it as a signal about the rest of the page.
If the vendor names the feature but not the tools, you cannot plan a workflow around it. Ask for the tools/list output before you buy.
Conductor's server is custom-quoted only, per CitedIndex, and Profound's only brand plan is custom. Ask what the quote assumes.
Otterly's $29 Lite and ZipTie's trial have no API or MCP. Read the plan row, not the headline price.
A server that can publish content is a server an agent can misuse. Ask which writes exist, on which plan, and whether you can scope a key to reads.
Several counts here come from third-party inventories dated August and September 2026. Useful pointers, not guarantees; confirm on the vendor's docs.
This list is for teams that want their AI visibility data inside Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor or another MCP client, without building an integration. Our pick is Prefer: MCP access starts on Growth ($129 a month) and queries all five engines Prefer tracks, with API access on the same plan. It is not the cheapest MCP entry here: Cituna, ZipTie, Qwairy and PromptWatch start lower. If you are choosing a tracker first and MCP is one column among many, the best AI visibility tools roundup fits better; for how Prefer’s own access works, plan by plan, see API and MCP access.
What we did: read each vendor’s pricing page in a rendered browser (Qwairy and SE Ranking on 26 September 2026, Otterly and PromptWatch on 23 September, ZipTie from its page HTML on 26 September), read the vendor MCP pages that Cituna and Asva AI publish, and cross-checked four dated third-party inventories (LLM Pulse, CitedIndex, the awesome-seo-mcp list on GitHub, Best GEO Software, plus Foglift’s guide). We did not connect to the rival servers ourselves. Where a fact comes from an inventory rather than the vendor, the item says so.
The first question is not whether a tool “has MCP”. It is which plan includes it, and what else that plan makes you buy. The table quotes each vendor’s own pricing page where we rendered it, and a dated inventory where we did not.
| Tool | Plan that includes MCP | What it costs | API | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prefer (our product) | Growth and above | $129/mo | API on Growth and above | Prefer docs, integrations |
| Cituna | Starter (reads); Pro and Max (writes) | $39/mo; writes from $119/mo | Ask (FAQ covers it; not in our read) | cituna.com/mcp, updated 12 September 2026 |
| ZipTie | Any paid configuration, as an add-on | From $42.75/mo plus $10/mo | REST in the same add-on | ziptie.ai/pricing, HTML read 26 September 2026 |
| LLM Pulse | Self-serve, per its own list | From EUR 49/mo | Not in the source we read | LLM Pulse inventory, updated 14 September 2026 |
| Qwairy | Starter | $89/mo | REST API on Growth, $229/mo | qwairy.co/pricing, rendered 26 September 2026 |
| PromptWatch | Essential | $95/mo | Same plan | promptwatch.com/pricing, rendered 23 September 2026 |
| SE Ranking | Core | $129/mo; AI search prompts need the $89/mo add-on | 25K API credits on Core | seranking.com/subscription, rendered 26 September 2026 |
| Otterly | Standard (Lite has neither) | $189/mo | Same plan | otterly.ai/pricing, rendered 23 September 2026 |
| Peec AI | Not stated | Ask | Enterprise, per Foglift | awesome-seo-mcp, September 2026 |
| Profound | Not stated; the only brand plan is custom | Custom | Enterprise, per Foglift | LLM Pulse inventory, check of 12 August 2026 |
| Asva AI | Not stated | Ask | Not in the source we read | asvaai.com/mcp, September 2026 |
Three of the eleven include MCP on the first paid plan with no add-on: Cituna, Qwairy and PromptWatch. Prefer starts it one plan up, on Growth; its Starter plan has no MCP, API or data export. ZipTie is close, at $10 on top of any paid configuration. Otterly’s $29 Lite plan is the trap on this list: it has neither API nor MCP, so its real entry price for this feature is $189.
A server you can plan around has a published tool list. Only two vendors on this list publish one on their own pages: Cituna (sixteen tools, twelve reads and four writes, with the plan each needs) and Asva AI (seven, from list_brands to generate_llms_txt, with OAuth setup steps).
Four more are counted or named by third-party inventories. LLM Pulse’s unauthenticated tools/list check on 12 August 2026 found 17 read-only tools on Profound, 17 on Otterly (11 reads, 6 writes) and 217 on SE Ranking, roughly 40 of them for AI search. Best GEO Software (6 September 2026) names PromptWatch’s getCitations, getCompetitorHeatmap, listContentGapPrompts, createContent and publishContentLive. Prefer, Qwairy and ZipTie describe the data the server returns without naming tools, and LLM Pulse states a count of about 85 on its own list, which we did not verify.
If the vendor has not published a list, ask for the output of a tools/list call before you sign. It takes a minute, and it is what the inventories on this page did.
Prefer is our product, and we ranked it first. Read this section with that in mind. MCP access is included on Growth and above: generate a key under Settings, Integrations, API and MCP, add it to Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor or any MCP client, and query the data the dashboard shows across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews and Google AI Mode. Starter has no MCP, API or data export. API access is on the same plans, scheduled warehouse sync is Enterprise only, and Agency Enterprise lists full API and MCP access together.
Where Prefer is not the answer:
If none of those apply, start with a free AI visibility audit or see the plans on the pricing page. Agencies running clients through one key should read Prefer for agencies.
Semrush and Ahrefs run official MCP servers with published endpoints, per the awesome-seo-mcp list (hand-checked September 2026); LLM Pulse’s check counted roughly 22 brand tools on Ahrefs and found Semrush’s list not published. They are SEO suites with an AI visibility module, so they sit on the best AI visibility tools list with that caveat. Conductor has a server on a custom-quoted contract only (CitedIndex, 12 September 2026). AthenaHQ had no public MCP guide and Evertune no customer-facing API or MCP published, per Foglift and CitedIndex. LLMrefs includes API access on its $79 plan, but MCP appears nowhere on its site and its /mcp path returned a 404 on 26 September 2026. HubSpot AEO’s product page mentions neither (rendered 26 September 2026); read that as “not listed”, not “does not have”.
For the full price lists behind these plans, see the AI visibility tool pricing review. For what the MCP server reads on Prefer, see Answer Engine Insights.
The questions buyers ask next.
It means the tool runs a Model Context Protocol server that an AI assistant can call directly, so you can ask Claude or ChatGPT for your citation numbers instead of exporting them. Prefer includes it on Growth and above. What you can do depends on the tools the server exposes: reads for reporting, and on some servers writes such as queuing a scan or publishing content.
On the sources dated on this page: Prefer (API from Growth), PromptWatch (Essential), Otterly (Standard), ZipTie ($10 add-on), SE Ranking (API credits on Core), Qwairy (REST API on Growth), LLMrefs (its $79 plan), AccuRanker (LLM Pro), and Peec AI and Profound on Enterprise. Cituna's FAQ covers REST availability, but our read did not record the answer.
See Prefer's API and MCP access →No. Prefer offers both from Growth, but they are different surfaces. An API is endpoints your code calls. MCP is a standard that lets an assistant call the vendor's tools without custom code. Qwairy, Peec AI and Profound split the two across plans.
It depends on how the tool scopes keys. Prefer's Agency Enterprise lists full API and MCP access; Otterly's Standard has unlimited workspaces with MCP included; SE Ranking's Agency Pack is a separate add-on. Ask whether one key sees every client or one.
See Prefer for agencies →Questions
Prefer does, from its Growth plan ($129 a month), with API access on the same plans. As of the dated reads on this page, so do Cituna (reads from its $39 Starter), ZipTie ($10 a month add-on), Qwairy (Starter, $89), PromptWatch (Essential, $95), SE Ranking (Core, $129), Otterly (Standard, $189) and LLM Pulse (self-serve from 49 euros, per its own list). Peec AI, Profound and Asva AI run documented servers whose plan gate our sources do not state. Semrush and Ahrefs have official servers too. Conductor gates MCP to a custom contract, and AthenaHQ, Evertune and LLMrefs had no public MCP documentation when we checked.
MCP access means the tool runs a Model Context Protocol server, so an AI assistant such as Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor can call the tool's data directly. Prefer's MCP access, for example, lets you ask your assistant which prompts you lost citations on and it queries Prefer for the answer, instead of you exporting a CSV. What you can ask depends on the tools the server exposes: most are reads (visibility, citations, share of voice, answer text); a few vendors add writes (queue a scan, create or publish content).
Yes. Prefer includes MCP access from Growth ($129 a month); Starter has no MCP, no API and no data export. You generate an MCP key in Settings under Integrations, API and MCP, connect it to any MCP client, and query your tracked prompts, mentions, citations, sentiment and share of voice across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews and Google AI Mode. API access is on the same plans, and scheduled warehouse sync is Enterprise only. The docs describe the server in prose rather than as a named tool list, and writes stay in the app.
No. Prefer, for example, offers both from Growth, but they are different surfaces. An API is a set of endpoints your own code calls; you build and maintain the integration. MCP is a standard that lets an assistant call a vendor's tools without custom code. Several tools split them the same way: Qwairy has MCP on Starter and its REST API on Growth, and Peec AI and Profound put the REST API on Enterprise. PromptWatch, Otterly, ZipTie and SE Ranking include both on the same plan.
Few, and mostly on third-party evidence. Prefer's MCP is a read path; drafting and publishing run in Action Center. Best GEO Software's inventory (6 September 2026) names createContent and publishContentLive on PromptWatch's server. LLM Pulse's check (12 August 2026) counted 6 write tools on Otterly's and 17 read-only tools on Profound's. Cituna's own page lists four writes (run_scan, set_gap_status, queue_article, mark_article_published) on Pro and Max. Confirm on the vendor's docs before you let an agent write.
No. Prefer includes MCP access from its Growth plan, and Cituna, Otterly, PromptWatch, Qwairy, ZipTie, SE Ranking, Peec AI, Profound and LLM Pulse all document servers on their own pages or on dated inventories, as this page lists with sources. Asva AI's MCP page says no competing platform ships an installable MCP server as of September 2026. Treat the claim as a reason to check the rest of that page.
Prefer includes it from Growth, $129 a month, with no add-on; Starter has no MCP, and several tools here start lower. Across the tools on this page, the first plan with MCP runs from $39 (Cituna, reads only) through $52.75 (ZipTie's cheapest preset plus its $10 add-on), $89 (Qwairy), $95 (PromptWatch) and $129 (SE Ranking, plus $89 for AI search prompts) to $189 (Otterly). Profound prices its only brand plan by custom quote, and Peec AI and Asva AI do not state the plan in the sources we read.
References
How to choose
Reads are enough for reporting: Prefer covers that from Growth, and Cituna, Qwairy and ZipTie on cheaper plans. If an agent should draft or publish, PromptWatch and Otterly have write tools per an inventory, and Cituna has four on Pro.
Prefer does not: its docs describe the server in prose, not as a named tool list. Cituna and Asva AI publish theirs. For the rest, ask the vendor for its tools/list output or rely on a dated inventory and say so in your own notes.
PromptWatch, Otterly, ZipTie and SE Ranking put both on one plan. Prefer, Qwairy, Peec AI and Profound put the API a tier or more above MCP.
MCP is a way to reach data. Prefer's MCP queries all five engines it tracks from Growth, but if the data behind a server is 15 prompts on 4 engines, the server does not help. Pick the tracker on prompts, engines and price first, then check the MCP row.
Keep going
See how answer engines describe your brand today, and where the openings are to outpace the competition.
5 cookies across three groups. Necessary ones stay on. Change the rest any time from the footer.
Sign-in, security, and remembering this choice. The site does not work without them.
Anonymous page and report usage so we can see what to improve. Nothing is tied to you.
Lets us credit the partner who sent you, so they are paid for the referral, and measure which campaigns bring people here. One cookie, no ad profiling.
